
What does it take to get a H1 in Higher Level Economics?
Sally Kiernan, a past pupil from The Institute of Education who achieved a H1 in Leaving Cert higher level economics, shares her advice for acing the exam.
Practice with past papers
Frequently attempting past questions and writing up your own concise notes from your learning material will contribute significantly towards your result.
Pay attention to current events
In preparation for my exams, I listened to current affairs programmes on the bus on the way to school every morning. I became more confident and familiar with current affairs and economic jargon which I ultimately used in my exam.
Exam timing
Fortunately the Economics paper is generous with time, but this time has to be spent effectively. I took ten minutes before I picked up a pen to read through the paper. This gave me a chance to pick my four long questions. Time should be allocated to all questions based on the weight of the marks.
Exam presentation
The presentation of your script should be accessible for the examiner. Market structure graphs should be drawn clearly and with no ambiguity.
Throughout your paper it should be clear that with each point that you have two distinct facts to back up your point.
In the exam I used a highlighter to highlight headings to make it obvious to the examiner. When marks are being allocated, presentation is important.
Sample Notes
Students who attend The Institute of Education are provided with exclusive, exam-focussed study notes to support their home study and revision. Below are a sample of the high-quality economics notes they receive.
Reaction to 2021 Economics Exam
Each year, our exceptional teachers give their take on the Leaving Certificate higher level exam papers. Read what Keith Hannigan, economics teacher at The Institute of Education, had to say about the 2021 exam below.
Reaction to Leaving Certificate 2021 Economics (Higher Level) by Keith Hannigan, Economics teacher at The Institute of Education.
Today students sat the first ever economics exam based on the new syllabus, which was both exciting and scary!
As a new paper, it was different and therefore brought new challenges.
The choice that students had this year would have made it very accessible for good students.
The short questions were testing, there was no room for waffle and students would really need to have known their material and be well prepared.
There were lots of parts to each question and topics were also combined within each question.
SECTION A: Short Questions
Due to changes this year, students had to answer five out of ten questions. Normally they will have to answer eight out of eight (no choice).
Question 1 was a lovely question on trade surpluses.
In question 2, students were given 4 statements and they had to say if they were positive or normative. This was a very nice question.
Question 3 was about price discrimination in relation to Netflix.
Question 4 was an interesting question on cigarettes and demerit goods (harmful goods). The jargon “demerit goods” may have caught some students out here.
Question 5 was a straightforward question on the banks. It looked at KBC Bank, the tracker mortgage scandal, why banks should be regulated and the duties of the Central Bank. If students had studied banks they would have liked this question.
Question 6 was lovely and focused on the Human Development Index (HDI). This is a very modern way of measuring human welfare and the standard of living of people in various countries, looking at education, life expectancy and money.
Question 7 was on gross debt per person and budget surpluses in each country and reasons why it has gone up from 2007-2019. Weaker students may have found this question challenging.
Question 8 was on utility. This was a lovely question and very much from the old syllabus.
Question 9 was a lovely question on market structures.
Question 10 was a common sense question on interest rates and whether the ECB should maintain rates at 0%.
Section B- Extended Response Questions
Due to changes this year, students have to answer three out of six questions. Normally they will have to answer four out of five.
In Question 11, using the HHI, students had to analyze what market structure the aircraft manufacturing industry operated in. The rest of the question examined oligopoly and economies of scale. Oligopoly is the most difficult market structure but it was a relatively basic question.
Question 12 was nice and topical and looked at globalisation, which is a brand new topic on the syllabus. The second part of the question focused on corporation tax in relation to Ireland and the EU. The last part of the question was on Brexit. Students would really have liked this question.
Question 13 was another lovely, topical question on the implications of the shortage of Playstation 5 at Christmas. The second part of the question looked at misleading consumer information in relation to Black Friday deals and how the government can prevent this from happening. The question finished on elasticity of Apple Airpods.
Question 14 was on inflation and the consequences of low inflation. The second part of the question was quite tricky and focused on investment in broadband and trying to increase Ireland’s competitiveness.
Question 15 looked at GDP and GNI and which one is a better indicator of how Irish citizens are doing. The last part of the question focused on the negative multiplier effect of Google withdrawing from it’s rental property contracts. Looking at negative multiplier effects however might have been off-putting for some students.
Question 16 was nice and looked at falling passenger numbers in airports due to covid. The second part looked at the minimum wage. The last part of the question was again, very topical, and looked at the reason for the increase in homelessness in Ireland and what the government can do to solve this problem.